Direct Instruction and Higher-Order Thinking Skills: Evidence from the Merdeka Curriculum Implementation

Authors

  • Nur Amalina Jempol Community College, Department of General Studies, Malaysia Author
  • Wan Hasmah Laili Binti Wan Hamat Pendidikan Islam dan Moral, Institut Pendidikan Guru, Malaysia Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3062-715X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64008/gpej.v2i2.65

Keywords:

direct instruction, higher-order thinking skills, merdeka curriculum, secondary education, quantitative study

Abstract

This study reviews the effectiveness of Direct Instruction in enhancing Higher-Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) during the implementation of the Merdeka Curriculum in secondary schools in Pekanbaru. The research was conducted from August to December 2025 using a quantitative quasi-experimental design involving 128 students divided into experimental and control groups. The experimental group received Direct Instruction integrated with HOTS-oriented tasks, while the control group experienced conventional instruction. Data were collected through validated HOTS assessment instruments covering analysis, evaluation, and creation domains. Statistical analysis used independent-samples t-tests and effect-size analysis. The results showed that the experimental group achieved a significantly higher mean score (M = 84.67, SD = 6.21) than the control group (M = 76.14, SD = 7.03), with t(126) = 7.18, p < .05, and a large effect size (Cohen’s d = 0.87). The evidence suggests that structured explanation, guided practice, and immediate feedback effectively support students’ analytical reasoning and analytical problem-solving skills in the implementation of the Merdeka Curriculum. The findings also suggest that explicit instructional approaches remain compatible with Higher-Order Thinking Skills (HOTS)-oriented learning when combined with cognitively demanding activities and systematic instructional scaffolding.

References

Akintayo, O. T., Eden, C. A., Ayeni, O. O., & Onyebuchi, N. C. (2024). Evaluating the impact of educational technology on learning outcomes in the higher education sector: A systematic review. International Journal of Management & Entrepreneurship Research, 6(5), 1395-1422. https://doi.org/10.53022/oarjms.2024.7.2.0026.

Al-Jarf, R. (2026). A systematic review of studies on teaching reading in Arabic to grades 1–12: Textbooks, skills, and learning outcomes. Journal of Learning and Development Studies, 6(5), 01-19. https://doi.org/10.32996/jlds.2026.6.5.1.

Arianto, F., Sumarno, A., Setyaedhi, H. S., Shofiana, F. R., & Hanif, M. (2026). Deep digital learning (DDL) model effect on higher education critical thinking and problem-solving skills: A quasi-experimental study. JURNAL EDUSCIENCE, 13(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.36987/jes.v13i1.8272.

Badolo, M. U., Malik, M. A., Nur, R. A., & Latifa, A. (2025). The impact of metacognitive strategy training on higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) in high school mathematics: A quasi-experimental study. International Journal of Environment, Engineering and Education, 7(2), 146-157. https://doi.org/10.55151/ijeedu.v7i2.302.

Bajo, S. M. (2025). Analysing the alignment of LOTS and HOTS in summative assessments within the Merdeka Curriculum. Journal of Language, Literature and Teaching, 7(1), 37-46. https://doi.org/10.35529/jllte.v7i1.37-46.

Brink, H. W., Loomans, M. G., Mobach, M. P., & Kort, H. S. (2021). Classrooms' indoor environmental conditions affecting the academic achievement of students and teachers in higher education: A systematic literature review. Indoor air, 31(2), 405-425. https://doi.org/10.1111/ina.12745.

Buabeng, I., & Amo-Darko, B. (2025). Curriculum reforms without foundation: The effects of inadequate preparation in curriculum reforms on Ghanaian teachers and the education system. Curriculum Perspectives, 45(2), 133-147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-025-00309-7.

Burhamzah, M., Sunra, L., Dollah, S., Alamsyah, A., & Rocholl, S. (2025). From competency-based to merdeka curriculum: A comparative study based on richards' curriculum development theory. Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa, dan Sastra, 11(4), 4921-4934. https://doi.org/10.30605/onoma.v11i4.7297.

Cekiso, M. (2025). Traditional methods, explicit, and implicit strategies in reading comprehension instruction: A shift toward strategic engagement. In Teaching Reading Comprehension to English Learners in Secondary Schools: A Research-Based Approach (pp. 267-288). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-0144-0.ch012.

Dignath, C., & Veenman, M. V. (2021). The role of direct strategy instruction and indirect activation of self-regulated learning—Evidence from classroom observation studies. Educational Psychology Review, 33(2), 489-533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09534-0.

Dimosthenous, A., Kyriakides, L., & Panayiotou, A. (2020). Short-and long-term effects of the home learning environment and teachers on student achievement in mathematics: A longitudinal study. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 31(1), 50-79. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2019.1642212.

Ding, C. (2026). From association to causation: Integrating experimental design principles into regression education. Educational Psychology Review, 38(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-026-10129-4.

Dursun, F., & Aykan, A. (2025). Exploring teachers’ narratives: Challenges and strategies for enhancing the teaching process. Sage Open, 15(1), 21582440251332557. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251332557.

Faradella, N. E., Wiyaka, W., & Egar, N. (2024). Teachers’ strategies and challenges in conducting HOTS-based activities in Merdeka Curriculum era. Indonesian Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.61251/ijoep.v1i2.64.

Febrianti, D. (2026). Inquiry-based instruction enhances critical thinking skills in elementary social studies education. Journal of Innovation and Research in Primary Education, 5(1), 1603-1615. https://doi.org/10.56916/jirpe.v5i1.3130.

Gopalan, M., Rosinger, K., & Ahn, J. B. (2020). Use of quasi-experimental research designs in education research: Growth, promise, and challenges. Review of Research in Education, 44(1), 218–243. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X20903302.

Gunawardena, M., & Wilson, K. (2021). Scaffolding students’ critical thinking: A process not an end game. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41, 100848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100848.

Hardiansyah, S., Kusmaedi, N., Ma’mun, A., Subarjah, H., Syahriadi, S., & Saputra, D. R. (2025). Eficacia de los modelos de aprendizaje integrado, aprendizaje basado en problemas y aprendizaje directo sobre HOTS en bádminton. Retos. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v68.109207.

Lo, C. O., & Feng, L.-C. (2020). Teaching higher order thinking skills to gifted students: A meta-analysis. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429420917854.

Mathews, H., & Cohen, J. (2022). Explicit instruction: A brief review of what we know and next directions for research. Routledge encyclopedia of education. Educational Psychology Section. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781138609877-REE20-1.

Mason, L., & Otero, M. (2021). Just how effective is direct instruction?. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 44(2), 225-244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-021-00295-x.

Maulidah, S., Setyosari, P., Kuswandi, D., & Ulfa, S. (2024). The effect of direct instructions strategy integrated computational thinking and prior knowledge on critical thinking and problem-solving. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 25(3). https://doi.org/10.21009/jtp.v25i3.49845.

Musyaffa, M. R., & Atno, A. (2025). Analysis of the history learning model based on Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) in the Merdeka Curriculum. Jurnal Pendidikan IPS, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.37630/jpi.v15i3.3306.

Novitra, F., Doni, R., Liana, M., Winarno, N., & Hakim, L. (2026). Development and content validation of a HOTS-oriented performance assessment for physics practicum in higher education to support SDG 4. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 12(3), 681-692. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v12i3.14471.

Nurdarmayanti, N. K., Hasan, H., & Nuraedah, N. (2025). Implementation of guided inquiry in science education to improve higher order thinking skills of fourth grade students at Masadian public elementary school. EDUKASIA Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 6(2), 1353-1366. https://doi.org/10.62775/edukasia.v6i2.1521.

Putri, M., & Akhsan, H. (2026). Development of temperature and heat teaching modules based on problem based learning to improve students' critical thinking. Journal of Science Education Research, 10(1), 15-25. https://doi.org/10.21831/jser.v10i1.91564.

Rahim, A., Aziz, A., Rahim, I., Herdiani, R., & Hoseo, J. A. (2025). Integrating HOTS in Indonesian high school textbooks: A comparative study of the 2013 and Merdeka Curriculum. Lingue: Jurnal Bahasa, Budaya, dan Sastra, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.33477/lingue.v7i1.9426.

Safitri, T., Ardianto, D., Permana, I., Kurniasih, S., & Nuraeni, E. (2025). Advancing biology education through HOTS-based learning on digestive system concepts: A systematic literature review. BIO-INOVED: Jurnal Biologi-Inovasi Pendidikan, 7(2), 166-179. https://doi.org/10.20527/bino.v7i2.21669.

Salsabila, A., Tahir, M., & Sofyan, R. R. (2025). Teacher’s competence in implementing Higher Order Thinking Skills in the development of a new paradigm: Merdeka Curriculum. Performance: Journal of English Education and Literature, 3(3).

Siedlecki, S. L. (2020). Quasi-experimental research designs. Clinical Nurse Specialist, 34(5), 198-202. https://doi.org/10.1097/NUR.0000000000000540.

Sukmawati, R. A., Pramita, M., & Saputra, N. A. B. (2025). The effectiveness of STEM based mathematics learning media in enhancing students higher order thinking skills. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v16i1.29736.

Suryamiati, W., Kahar, A. P., & Setiadi, A. E. (2019). Improving higher-order thinking skill through POE (Predict, Observe, Explain) and guided discovery learning models. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 5(2), 173–178. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v5i2.8266.

Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive architecture and instructional design: 20 years later. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 261–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09465-5.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-17

Issue

Section

Artikel